Ebrahim AlhamedFrameworks Library

Every framework, one page.

Every framework in the library, on one page.

163 frameworks across 48 modules · 7 courses

LPO · Leading People & Organisations

m.01 · Congruence Analysis

Congruence Model · Nadler & Tushman

Strategy · Tasks · People · Culture · PPS

Friction lives in the pair, not the element. Adjust the element causing the miss — not the one complaining.

m.01 · Congruence Analysis

The Eleven Pairs · Nadler & Tushman

S–T · S–P · S–C · S–PPS · T–P · T–C · C–P · PPS–T · PPS–T/P · PPS–P · PPS–C

Walk every pair. The first "no" is where to start.

m.01 · Congruence Analysis

Kerr's Folly · Kerr · 1975 (reprinted 1995)

what you reward · what you actually want · the gap

You get what you measure — not what you asked for.

m.02 · Psychological Safety & IGNITE

Psychological Safety · Edmondson

frame as learning, not execution · invite challenge · amplify the shy · say the second thing that comes to mind

Learning zone = high safety + high accountability.

m.02 · Psychological Safety & IGNITE

IGNITE 6-step ideation · Hardy

Individual · Group · No-Judgement · Innovate · Take-notes · Evaluate

Alone first, then together, then decide.

m.02 · Psychological Safety & IGNITE

4 Leadership Challenges · Hardy

Commitment · Contribution · Coordination · Adaptation

Every follower asks four questions. Innovation needs the fourth.

m.03 · Steiner, Hackman & the Diversity Paradox

Four Founding Acts · after Hackman

Clarify the task · Decide who is in · Build relationships · Design the process

A course distillation — Hackman's own Leading Teams (2002) lists five conditions. Get the setup right; firefighting later is expensive.

m.04 · Growth Mindset & the Pygmalion Loop

Pygmalion / Self-Fulfilling Prophecy · Merton (1948) · Rosenthal & Jacobson (1968)

belief → treatment → their belief → their behaviour

Your expectations are a management tool you are already using — usually unconsciously.

m.05 · SAID, Theory U & the 5 Active-Listening Moves

SAID Feedback Model · Hardy

Situation — specific moment · Action — observable behaviour · Impact — effect on others / work · Do — what to do next

Separate behaviour from person. Speak to the first three or four sentences.

m.05 · SAID, Theory U & the 5 Active-Listening Moves

Scharmer's 4 Levels of Listening · Scharmer

Downloading — I already know · Factual — I notice new data · Empathic — I feel what they feel · Generative — I sense where we are going

Most leaders listen at Level 1. Level 3 is where trust is built.

m.07 · Social Styles, Grice & the Culture Map

Grice's 4 Maxims · Grice (1975)

Quantity — say as much as is useful · Quality — be truthful · Relation — be relevant · Manner — be clear

Break one and the message corrodes.

m.07 · Social Styles, Grice & the Culture Map

Culture Map · Meyer

Communicating (high/low context) · Evaluating · Persuading · Leading · Deciding · Trusting · Disagreeing · Scheduling

Your "direct" is someone else's "rude". Re-calibrate.

m.08 · The 3-a-Week Rule & Meaningful Requests

Network Map — seniority × difference · LPO custom

Y: seniority (yours → more senior) · X: difference (same as you → very different)

Most people over-index on same-level, same-type. Bridge deliberately.

m.09 · System 1 / System 2 & the Bias Audit

System 1 vs System 2 · Kahneman

S1: fast, automatic, intuitive · S2: slow, deliberate, analytical

Most decisions are S1. Reserve S2 for the ones that will matter in a year.

m.10 · Cialdini's 6 & the Two Routes

Two Routes to Persuasion · Petty & Cacioppo

Central — content, logic, evidence · Peripheral — cues, source, format

Under time-pressure people default to peripheral. Design your messaging for the route the receiver is actually on.

m.10 · Cialdini's 6 & the Two Routes

Cialdini's 6 Principles · Cialdini

Reciprocity · Commitment & consistency · Social proof · Liking · Scarcity · Authority

They stack. Using two is often more than twice as powerful as one.

m.10 · Cialdini's 6 & the Two Routes

Door-in-the-Face / Foot-in-the-Door · Cialdini (1975) · Freedman & Fraser (1966)

DITF: big-then-small (Cialdini) · FITD: small-then-big (Freedman & Fraser)

Two opposite mechanics. Both exploit commitment and consistency.

FA · Financial Accounting

m.01 · The Balance Sheet Equation

Three Statements · IFRS / US GAAP

Balance Sheet · Income Statement · Cash Flow Statement

Retained earnings flow from IS → BS. Operating cash flow starts from IS.

m.01 · The Balance Sheet Equation

Double-Entry Bookkeeping · Accounting Convention

Debits · Credits · T-accounts

Every transaction affects at least two accounts. Debits = Credits, always.

m.02 · Accruals vs. Cash

Revenue Recognition — 4 tests · IFRS 15

Risks & rewards transferred · No continuing involvement · Amount measurable · Cash probable

All four, or you cannot recognise yet.

m.02 · Accruals vs. Cash

Matching Principle · Fundamental

COGS with revenue · Period costs with the period

Recognise the expense in the period that earned the revenue.

m.02 · Accruals vs. Cash

Accruals & Deferrals · Accounting mechanics

accrued revenue / expense · deferred revenue / expense

Adjust for the gap between economic event and cash movement.

m.03 · Capitalise or Expense

Capitalise vs Expense · IAS 16

future economic benefit · past transaction · cost measurable

If all three, capitalise. Otherwise expense.

m.03 · Capitalise or Expense

Acquisition Cost · Asset recognition

purchase price · duties & taxes · installation & labour · costs to ready for use

Capitalise all costs necessary to get the asset ready for its intended use — no more.

m.03 · Capitalise or Expense

Repairs vs Improvements · Maintenance principle

Repair → expense · Improvement → capitalise

Does it extend life, reduce cost or increase capacity? Improvement. Otherwise repair.

m.03 · Capitalise or Expense

Depreciation & Disposal · Matching principle

Straight-line most common · Useful life × salvage estimate · Gain/Loss = proceeds − NBV

Spread cost across the periods that benefit from the asset.

m.04 · What You Paid For, Beyond the Tangible

Research vs Development · IFRS

Research: expensed · Development: capitalised if technically feasible and commercially viable

Where a firm draws this line is a judgement worth reading.

m.05 · Obligations, Certain and Not

Current vs Long-term · Present value

Current: face value · Long-term: present value of future cash

Discount obligations beyond 12 months (or sooner if the discount effect is material).

m.05 · Obligations, Certain and Not

Contingent Classification · IAS 37

Remote: ignore · Possible: disclose in footnotes · Probable: book a provision

Three buckets. Management judgement decides which.

m.05 · Obligations, Certain and Not

Provision Measurement · Liability measurement

one-off: most likely amount · large population: expected value

Review and adjust every reporting period.

m.07 · Relevant Costs, Contribution & Break-Even

Contribution Margin · Decision making

CM = revenue − variable costs · CM ratio = CM / revenue · Break-even = fixed / CM ratio

Every extra unit contributes CM to covering fixed costs, then profit.

m.07 · Relevant Costs, Contribution & Break-Even

Absorption vs Variable Costing · Inventory valuation

Absorption: fixed overhead in product cost · Variable: only variable costs

Absorption boosts reported income in periods of rising inventory. Variable is cleaner for decisions.

m.08 · Sales Cascades. Cash Reveals.

Master Budget · Budget planning

sales → production → materials & labour → cash → statements

Sales is the driver. Everything cascades from it.

m.08 · Sales Cascades. Cash Reveals.

Cash Flow Forecasting · Working capital

operating cycle · seasonality · capex · financing

Convert accrual budget to cash using timing of receivables, payables, inventory.

m.08 · Sales Cascades. Cash Reveals.

Variance Analysis · Performance management

price · quantity · volume · favourable / unfavourable

Isolate what drove the gap. Act on the cause, not the symptom.

m.08 · Sales Cascades. Cash Reveals.

Flexible Budget · Cost control

budget adjusted for actual volume

Compare actuals to a budget that reflects what really happened, not what you planned.

m.10 · DuPont, ROIC & the EVA Question

DuPont Decomposition · DuPont

ROE = Net margin × Asset turnover × Equity multiplier · (Equity multiplier = Assets / Equity)

Three levers for ROE. Most firms overuse one and underuse two.

DA · Data Analytics

m.01 · The Range You Can Defend

Central Limit Theorem · Statistical foundation

sample means → normal as n grows · SE = SD / √n

With n ≥ 30, the sampling distribution is normal regardless of source shape.

m.01 · The Range You Can Defend

Confidence Intervals · Inferential statistics

point estimate ± margin of error · MoE = 2 × SE for 95%

A 95% CI means 95% of such intervals (over many samples) would contain the true parameter — not that there is a 95% probability this one does.

m.02 · A/B Testing & Hypothesis Logic

Hypothesis Test · Statistical inference

H₀ (default / null) · t-statistic = (observed − expected) / SE · p-value · decision threshold

If |t| > 2 (roughly), reject H₀. Otherwise do not.

m.02 · A/B Testing & Hypothesis Logic

A/B Testing (RCT) · Causal inference standard

random assignment · treatment vs control · difference in means is the causal effect

Randomisation is the only antidote to confounding.

m.02 · A/B Testing & Hypothesis Logic

Type I vs Type II Error · Decision theory

Type I: false positive (α) · Type II: false negative (β)

Every threshold trades one off against the other. Pick deliberately.

m.03 · Regression & Correlation

Simple Linear Regression · OLS

y = a + b·x + ε · intercept a · slope b · residual ε

Minimise the sum of squared residuals. Slope = change in y per unit x.

m.03 · Regression & Correlation

Multiple Regression · Multivariate OLS

control for confounders · each coefficient isolates one effect · adjusted R² penalises complexity

Add variables for business logic, not for R².

m.03 · Regression & Correlation

Model Quality Checklist · Regression diagnostics

Adjusted R² · p-values and t-stats · coefficient signs · residual patterns

High R² + sensible signs + random residuals = a model you can defend.

m.04 · Dummies, Interactions & Validation

Dummy Variables · Categorical encoding

k categories → k−1 binary variables · reference category = all zeros · coefficient = gap vs reference

Interpret dummy coefficients as "difference from the reference group, other things equal".

m.04 · Dummies, Interactions & Validation

Interaction Terms · Conditional effects

x₁ × x₂ · effect of x₁ depends on x₂

Include interactions when business logic says one variable modulates another.

m.04 · Dummies, Interactions & Validation

Overfit vs Underfit · Bias-variance tradeoff

Underfit: high bias, misses signal · Overfit: high variance, fits noise

Optimise validation error, never training error.

m.04 · Dummies, Interactions & Validation

Lift & Gain Charts · Predictive evaluation

sort predictions · measure % of positives in top decile · lift = captured / base rate

Lift > 1 means your model beats random.

m.05 · From Data to Decision

Analytics Workflow · Christodoulou

Problem → Data → Analysis → Action

Without the fourth step, it is homework.

m.05 · From Data to Decision

Known-Unknowns · Rumsfeld · 2002

known-knowns · known-unknowns · unknown-knowns · unknown-unknowns

Use data to move unknowns into knowns. Guard against unknown-knowns (gut feels).

m.05 · From Data to Decision

Data Maturity · Analytics leadership

raw → cleaned → statistical → predictive → prescriptive

Climb one rung at a time. Level 5 requires all four below.

m.05 · From Data to Decision

Statistical vs Practical · Executive decision-making

significant: real, not noise · practical: worth the rollout

Both must be true before you act.

ME · Marketplace Environment

m.01 · Why Trade Happens

Price-Mediated Exchange · Myatt

buyer valuation · seller cost · negotiated price · gain from trade

Trade occurs when V > C. Surplus = V − C, split between parties.

m.01 · Why Trade Happens

Information Frictions · Myatt

private information · search cost · trust

Hidden information narrows the set of trades that happen. Brokers exist to fix that.

m.03 · When Something Moves

Shock Propagation · Galeotti

Supply shocks (cost, tech, regulation) · Demand shocks (income, preferences)

Supply curve shifts right → price ↓, quantity ↑. Demand curve shifts right → both rise.

m.03 · When Something Moves

Price Elasticity · Mankiw-Taylor

E = %ΔQ / %ΔP · elastic |E| > 1 · inelastic |E| < 1

Incidence of a shock falls on the less-elastic side. (Markup rule (P−MC)/P = 1/|E| is the monopoly application — see m.04.)

m.03 · When Something Moves

Government Interventions · Myatt

taxes · subsidies · price controls · tariffs

Any price away from equilibrium creates deadweight loss. Incidence splits by elasticity.

m.03 · When Something Moves

Substitutes & Complements · Galeotti

cross-price elasticity

Shocks ripple into related markets. Substitutes gain; complements lose.

m.04 · The 1/2 Rule & Cournot

Monopoly Rules of Thumb · Myatt

Q* = Q_max / 2 · P* = (P_max + MC) / 2 · Profit = S_max / 2 · DWL = S_max / 4

For linear demand, the optimum is symmetric. Half the quantity, half the surplus.

m.04 · The 1/2 Rule & Cournot

Cournot Oligopoly · Myatt

Q_i = Q_max / (N+1) · per-firm profit = (P_max − MC) × Q_max / (N+1)²

As N grows, price → MC and profits → 0.

m.04 · The 1/2 Rule & Cournot

Asymmetric Cournot · Myatt

lower cost → larger margin → bigger share

Cost advantages compound: market share ∝ profit margin.

m.05 · The HHI, Economic Rents & Innovation

Herfindahl-Hirschman Index · Antitrust theory

HHI = Σ(share%)² · range 10,000/N (equal firms) to 10,000 (pure monopoly)

FTC threshold: HHI > 2,500 = highly concentrated. Share expressed in percent.

m.05 · The HHI, Economic Rents & Innovation

Strategic Effects of Innovation · Myatt

cost-reducing: winner takes more · quality-improving: demand shifts

Innovation by the leader widens the gap; by the follower, may not break even.

m.06 · Four Structures. One Spectrum.

Four Market Structures · IO canon

Perfect Competition · Monopolistic Competition · Oligopoly · Monopoly

As N grows and barriers fall, price → MC and consumer surplus grows.

m.06 · Four Structures. One Spectrum.

Antitrust Policy · Legal framework

merger review · price-fixing · predatory pricing · exclusive dealing

High HHI = presumption of harm, rebuttable with efficiency evidence.

m.06 · Four Structures. One Spectrum.

Network Effects · Modern tech economics

positive externality · tipping · lock-in

Network markets tip toward a single winner — unless interoperability is forced.

EL · Executive Leadership

m.01 · The Johari Window

Johari Window · Luft & Ingham (1955)

Open · Blind Spot · Hidden · Unknown

Grow the Open area by asking for feedback (shrinks blind spot) and disclosing more (shrinks hidden self).

m.01 · The Johari Window

Dunning-Kruger Effect · Kruger & Dunning (1999)

incompetence obscures incompetence

The skills to produce a good answer are the same skills needed to recognise one.

m.01 · The Johari Window

Better-Than-Average Effect · Self-perception research

most people rate themselves above average on most traits

Assume your self-rating is inflated. Calibrate against external data.

m.02 · The Big Five (5STeP)

Big Five Model (OCEAN / 5STeP) · McCrae & Costa

O · C · E · A · N

No profile is "better". Fit between profile and role determines effectiveness.

m.02 · The Big Five (5STeP)

Nature vs Nurture · Personality genetics

~50% heritable · rest shaped by environment and experience

Traits are stable but not fixed. Range can be trained.

m.02 · The Big Five (5STeP)

Situation Strength · Personality research

strong situations constrain behaviour · weak situations reveal traits

In a crisis, personality matters less. In ambiguity, it matters more.

m.03 · Six Styles, One Self

Six Leadership Styles · Goleman-inspired

Directive · Visionary · Affiliative · Participative · Coaching · Pacesetting

Match style to context: crisis, vision, relationships, input, development, standards.

m.03 · Six Styles, One Self

Servant Leadership · Greenleaf

genuine care for welfare · facilitating others' success

Trust is the foundation of influence. You cannot lead people you don't care about.

m.03 · Six Styles, One Self

Reading the Room · Executive practice

team capability · stakes and urgency · culture

Default to your natural style; flex deliberately for the context.

m.04 · Synergy or Process Loss

Team Performance Model · Hackman (1998)

right people + right processes = high performing

Composition matters, but process matters more.

m.04 · Synergy or Process Loss

Three Types of Conflict · Team dynamics

Task — healthy · Relationship — toxic · Process — misdirects

Encourage task conflict. Minimise the other two.

m.04 · Synergy or Process Loss

Decision Methods · Organisational design

Consensus · Leader-decides · Majority

Low trust → consensus. High trust → leader-decides often fine. Majority creates aggrieved minorities.

m.05 · What Got You Here Won't Get You There

GAPS Analysis · Development planning tool

Global — current state · Assess — the gap · Plan — one specific leadership goal · Sustain — supporters and accountability

The goal must be behavioural, not generic. Not "be better"; "be comfortable initiating difficult conversations".

m.05 · What Got You Here Won't Get You There

Riccombeni Case Lessons · Course case

strengths become weaknesses in new roles · advancement ≠ automatic reward · lead by facilitating performance

Every promotion requires uninstalling old software before installing new.

m.05 · What Got You Here Won't Get You There

LBS Six Competencies · LBS framework

Know Yourself · Communicate Powerfully · Deliver Through Others · Solve Complex Problems · Lead Change · Digital Fluency

Your 360 evaluates on these six. Your PDP should target one or two.

SM · Advanced Strategic Management

m.01 · The Value Wedge

Value-Based Strategy (the Wedge) · Brandenburger & Stuart · 1996

Willingness to pay (WTP) · Price · Cost · Supplier opportunity cost · Value created = WTP minus cost

The only profit that exists is the gap between WTP and cost; price determines who keeps it.

m.01 · The Value Wedge

Added Value · Brandenburger & Stuart

Added value = total value with the firm minus total value without

A firm can only claim the value the network would lose without it — no more.

m.01 · The Value Wedge

Two Routes to Advantage · after Ghemawat & Rivkin

Differentiation: raise WTP more than cost rises · Cost leadership: cut cost more than WTP falls

Choose one route and align every activity to it; the middle is not a position.

m.02 · The Five Forces

Porter's Five Forces · Porter · HBR 1979, updated 2008

Threat of new entrants · Bargaining power of buyers · Bargaining power of suppliers · Threat of substitutes · Rivalry among competitors

The strongest force sets the ceiling. Analyse all five; act on the binding one.

m.02 · The Five Forces

Industry vs Firm Effects · after Porter

Industry structure → average profitability · Firm position → deviation from average

First choose an attractive industry; then choose a defensible position within it.

m.03 · Generic Strategies

Generic Strategies · Porter · Competitive Strategy 1980

Cost leadership · Differentiation · Focus (cost) · Focus (differentiation) · Stuck in the middle (trap)

Choose a cell and align every activity to it; the middle is not a stable resting place.

m.03 · Generic Strategies

Activity System Alignment · after Porter

Primary activities · Support activities · Fit and reinforcement

Advantage compounds when activities reinforce each other; a single activity is easily copied.

m.04 · Commitment & Capacity Games

Commitment as Strategy · Ghemawat · Commitment 1991

Irreversibility · Visibility to rivals · Effect on rival's best response

A move that is reversible is tactics; a move that is irreversible and visible is strategy.

m.04 · Commitment & Capacity Games

Capacity Pre-emption · after Ghemawat

First-mover capacity build · Deterrence of rival entry or expansion · Post-entry punishment credibility

Pre-empt only when you can fill the capacity and when doing so makes rival entry unprofitable.

m.04 · Commitment & Capacity Games

Deter vs Accommodate · after Ghemawat

Deter: make entry or expansion unprofitable for rival · Accommodate: allow rival a share, avoid destructive rivalry

Deterrence requires both the ability and the will to punish; without both, it is not credible.

m.05 · Disruption from Below

Sustaining vs Disruptive Innovation · Christensen · The Innovator's Dilemma 1997

Sustaining trajectory: better along existing dimensions · Disruptive trajectory: simpler, cheaper, lower-performing to start · Crossing point: disruptor meets mainstream threshold

Watch the trajectory, not the current performance gap. Disruption happens when the two curves cross.

m.05 · Disruption from Below

Performance Overshoot · after Christensen

Incumbent keeps improving beyond what most buyers need · Price premium grows · Fringe and non-consumers become viable targets for disruptors

If your product is better than most customers need, you are vulnerable from below.

m.06 · The Two-Sided Platform

Two-Sided Market Theory · Rochet & Tirole · 2003 / Eisenmann · 2006

Two distinct user groups · Cross-side network effects · Price structure (not a single price) · Subsidise one side, charge the other

The strategic question is not what to charge but which side to charge — and that depends on which side draws the other.

m.06 · The Two-Sided Platform

Chicken-and-Egg Bootstrap · after Parker, Van Alstyne & Choudary

Seed supply before demand · Subsidise the harder side first · Piggyback on existing user base · Single-side standalone value

Solve the chicken-and-egg or neither side shows up. The first side you onboard must have standalone value until the second arrives.

m.06 · The Two-Sided Platform

Winner-Take-All vs Multi-Platform · after Farronato, Toffel & Zhu · HBS 621-016

Single-homing (users pick one platform) · Multi-homing (users join several) · Network effect strength and reach

Strong cross-side effects plus single-homing tilts toward winner-take-all; weak effects or easy multi-homing supports coexistence.

m.07 · Ecosystem as Structure

Ecosystem-as-Structure · Adner · Journal of Management 2017

Value proposition (the boundary-setter) · Activities · Actors · Positions · Links

Start with the value proposition and work backward to the alignment structure it requires; do not start with the partners.

m.07 · Ecosystem as Structure

Co-innovation and Adoption-Chain Risk · Adner

Co-innovation risk: partners' innovations not yet ready · Adoption-chain risk: partners must change their own behaviour

Your ecosystem is only as fast as its slowest required alignment. Identify which partner is the bottleneck.

m.07 · Ecosystem as Structure

Ecosystem-as-Affiliation vs Ecosystem-as-Structure · Adner

Affiliation: community of associated actors around a platform · Structure: configuration of activities for a specific value proposition

Use structure thinking when alignment must shift; use affiliation thinking when you are counting partners.

m.08 · The Boundary of the Firm

Transaction Cost Economics · Coase · 1937 / Williamson · 1985

Market coordination (price) · Firm coordination (authority) · Transaction costs of each route

Use the market by default. Bring an activity inside only when transacting on the open market costs more than managing it yourself.

m.08 · The Boundary of the Firm

Asset Specificity and Hold-Up · Williamson

Relationship-specific investments · Hold-up: the party who invested loses bargaining power after contracting · Thin supplier markets amplify hold-up risk

The more relationship-specific the required investment, the stronger the case for internalisation.

m.08 · The Boundary of the Firm

Make / Buy / Ally Decision · after Williamson and Dyer, Kale & Singh

Make: authority, full control, dulled incentives · Buy: price, market discipline, hold-up risk · Ally: shared assets, shared risk, partial control

Ally when you need specificity but cannot bear full internalisation costs; make when you can scale and sharpen internally.

m.09 · Ally, Acquire, or Build

When to Ally vs Acquire · Dyer, Kale & Singh · HBR 2004

Resources and synergy type (modular, sequential, reciprocal) · Market conditions (uncertainty, competition for partner) · Collaboration competence (which mode can you execute?)

Choose the mode before choosing the partner. The mode should follow from resources, market, and competence — not from habit.

m.09 · Ally, Acquire, or Build

Three Synergy Types · Dyer, Kale & Singh

Modular: pool independently managed results · Sequential: one party hands off to the other · Reciprocal: deep iterative joint work

Modular synergies argue for non-equity alliances; reciprocal synergies with hard assets argue for acquisition.

m.09 · Ally, Acquire, or Build

Collaboration Competence Trap · Dyer, Kale & Singh

Organisational bias toward familiar mode · M&A group vs business development silos · Post-deal execution capability

The most common failure is choosing the mode you know how to execute rather than the mode the situation demands.

MS · Customer-centric Market Strategies

m.01 · The 5Cs

5Cs of Market Analysis · after Kotler

Company · Customers · Competitors · Collaborators · Context

Run all five before you set strategy — a gap in any one C produces blind spots the 4Ps cannot fix.

m.01 · The 5Cs

PESTLE / PESTE · strategic management tradition

Political · Economic · Sociocultural · Technological · Legal · Environmental

Context is not background noise — macro forces can invalidate an otherwise sound plan.

m.01 · The 5Cs

Customer Centricity · after Drucker · Ambler · Gerstner

Customer as unit of analysis · Share of wallet over market share · Customer portfolio over product portfolio

The aim of marketing is to know the customer so well that the product sells itself.

m.02 · The CLV Formula

CLV Formula · after Gupta & Lemmens

m = annual margin · r = retention rate · i = discount rate · AC = acquisition cost · CLV = m × r/(1+i−r) − AC

Three levers: lower AC, raise r, grow m. Retention is usually the highest-return lever.

m.02 · The CLV Formula

Customer Equity · after Gupta & Lehmann

CLV × current base · + discounted CLV of future acquisitions · = bottom-up firm valuation

Aggregate CLV is a sanity-check on market cap — if the maths don't square, growth assumptions are doing all the work.

m.02 · The CLV Formula

CRM Three Strategies · marketing-process tradition

Acquisition — win new customers · Retention — keep existing ones · Expansion — grow margin per customer

Not all customers are equally valuable; allocate CRM spend where CLV improvement is largest, not where volume is highest.

m.03 · From Funnel to Loop

Customer Decision Journey · Court, Elzinga, Mulder & Vetvik · McKinsey 2009

Consider · Evaluate · Buy · Experience · Bond / Loyalty loop

Map where your customers are losing faith in the loop — that is where to invest, not at top-of-funnel.

m.03 · From Funnel to Loop

AIDA Funnel (the model being replaced) · Lewis · 1898

Awareness · Interest · Desire · Action

AIDA is useful for new-to-category launches; the loop model is more useful once a customer base exists and loyalty is the growth lever.

m.03 · From Funnel to Loop

Loyalty Loop · Edelman · HBR 2010

Post-purchase bond · Advocacy as trigger for others' Consider stage · Repurchase shortcut bypasses open evaluation

A strong loyalty loop compresses customer equity — same CLV at lower re-acquisition cost.

m.04 · STP

STP Cascade · after Smith (1956) & Kotler

Segment — discover groups with common needs · Target — choose where to play · Position — define how to win in the mind

The cascade is sequential: weak segmentation produces weak targeting, which produces a positioning statement with no real audience.

m.04 · STP

Criteria for Good Segmentation (DAMAS) · Kotler

Differentiable · Actionable · Measurable · Accessible · Substantial

A segment that fails any one of these five tests will either not be reachable or not be worth reaching.

m.04 · STP

Targeting 3Cs · marketing-strategy tradition

Customer opportunity — size, growth, reachability · Company fit — objectives, capabilities, resources · Competitive intensity — underserved needs, rivals' strengths

Targeting is the discipline of saying no — the segments you decline define the strategy as much as the ones you choose.

m.04 · STP

Positioning Statement · Kotler · Lafley & Martin

For (target customer) · who (need) · the (product) is a (category) · that (core benefit) · unlike (alternatives), our product (point of difference)

A positioning statement is only useful if it would embarrass a competitor — vague statements are not positions.

All frameworks · 163 total ··· ← back to the shelf